Remembering the Armenian Genocide: A Case Study of Germany’s Recognition and Its Implications for Memory and Identity

The Armenian Genocide stands as one of the darkest chapters in modern history, yet its memory and recognition vary significantly across different countries. This paper proposes to explore the process and implications of the recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the German Parliament in 2016. By examining the historical context, socio-political dynamics, and the role of various actors, this paper aims to discuss on how the memory of the genocide has evolved in Germany and its impact on collective memory and identity.
Introduction:
The memory of the Armenian Genocide has been a contentious issue globally, with debates surrounding recognition, denial, and commemoration. Germany’s recognition of the genocide in 2016 marked a significant milestone, considering its historical complicity and the complexities of its socio-political landscape. This paper seeks to delve into the process leading to this recognition, the challenges encountered, and the implications for memory and identity within Germany.
Objectives:
To examine the historical context of the Armenian Genocide and Germany’s involvement.
To analyze the socio-political factors influencing the recognition of the Armenian Genocide in Germany.
To explore the role of various stakeholders, including Armenian diaspora communities, Turkish groups, and German policymakers, in shaping the discourse on genocide recognition.
To assess the impact of Germany’s recognition of the Armenian Genocide on collective memory and identity, both within Germany and globally.
To offer insights into the broader implications for genocide recognition, remembrance, and reconciliation efforts.
Expected Outcomes:
This paper expects to provide a nuanced understanding of the process and implications of the recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Germany. By analyzing the interplay of historical narratives, political interests, and collective memory, this research aims to contribute to scholarship on genocide recognition and reconciliation. Furthermore, insights from this study may inform future initiatives aimed at promoting remembrance, understanding, and reconciliation in contexts of historical trauma.
Conclusion:
The recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the German Parliament in 2016 represents a significant moment in the ongoing struggle for acknowledgment and remembrance. By exploring this case study, this paper seeks to illuminate the complexities of genocide recognition, the power dynamics at play, and the enduring impact on memory and identity. Through a multidisciplinary approach, this research aims to contribute to scholarly discourse and facilitate dialogue on the importance of remembrance and reconciliation in confronting historical injustices.